Express Press Release Distribution

Accounting
Advertising
Aerospace
Agriculture
Apparel & Fashion
Automotive
Biotech
Chemicals
Computers
Construction
Consumer Services
Defense
Education
Electronics
Energy
Entertainment
Environment
Financial
Food & Beverage
Government
Healthcare
Human Resources
Industrial
International Trade
Internet & Online
Law
Management
Marketing
Media
Non Profit
Pharmaceuticals
Real Estate
Retail
Semiconductors
Small Business
Software
Sports
Telecommunications
Transportation / Logistics
Travel

EPR Archived News

Archived News 2012
~ April
~ March
~ February
~ January

Archived News 2011
~ December
~ November
~ October
~ September
~ August
~ July
~ June
~ May
~ April
~ March
~ February
~ January

Archived News 2010
Archived News 2009
Archived News 2008
Archived News 2007
Archived News 2006
Archived News 2005
Archived News 2004

 

Why Discrete Manufacturers Take a `Rear View` Look at Product Costs

Released on = March 31, 2006, 4:17 am

Press Release Author = John Busa

Industry = Software

Press Release Summary = Azzolino Delineates Why Discrete Manufacturers Take a "Rear
View" Look at Product Costs

Press Release Body = According to Frank Azzolino, President & CEO of aPriori, the
Massachusetts based Cost Management Platform company, "There are a number of reasons
why discrete manufacturers have been forced to take a "rear view" look at product
costs, such as evaluating and allocating product costs well after production was
underway."

1. Cost information in most organizations is fragmented throughout the enterprise.
Critical pieces of cost information are spread across independent silos within an
organization in different functions like engineering, planning, manufacturing,
sourcing, finance, etc. This situation typically results in estimates that do not
include all relevant information required to make accurate and predictive product
cost assessments.

2. In most organizations product cost estimates are developed by specialized
organizations in cost engineering or VA/VE departments. In most cases, these cost
estimates are created separately and independently of the people making the design,
manufacturing, and sourcing decisions. This separation results in many decisions
being made in a cost knowledge vacuum. The impact of these decisions is typically
not known for at least a full financial period after production is well underway.

3. Product cost estimates (especially early ones) are often based on historical
information or very general heuristics (e.g. weight) and are too inaccurate and lack
statistical confidence for effective decision making.

4. Most cost estimating activity falls on a relatively small group of specialized
people spending hours manually producing each estimate. Since the demand for
costing feedback cannot always be met, the opportunity to experiment with the cost
impact of design, manufacturing, planning, sourcing, etc. alternatives is limited
and can not be readily cost optimized.

5. Most cost estimates are static and are not continually updated when new design,
manufacturing, planning, or sourcing information becomes available as the product
progresses through its design-to-production-to-delivery lifecycle. Out-of-date cost
information can not be relied upon for downstream decision making.

6. Costing practices are not always standardized across the enterprise. As more
information is available, different costing practices and methods are used to
re-cost items. Unfortunately this makes it difficult to leverage previous estimating
work and build traceability in product cost accrual.

7. Typically cost estimates are not managed through a product's development through
production lifecycle. Multiple cost estimates from different sources are created as
different times during the process. It becomes unclear which product cost estimate
is current or valid.

8. Today's cost accounting methodologies begin with the financial statement for the
prior closed financial period. The costs in that period are then allocated across
various product lines and processes which are then further allocated for each
individual product. These are by definition "rear view" mirror product costs.

aPriori's Cost Management Software Platform enables manufacturers to better
understand product cost decisions early and throughout the product lifecycle.
aPriori's Cost Management Platform empowers manufacturers to lower cost-of-goods
sold (COGS), provides real-time visibility to "cost-critical" decision information,
and builds critical cost knowledge to go on the business "offensive." aPriori's
patent-protected cost management platform allows companies to assess, control, and
reduce cost of goods sold by whole percentages. The aPriori Platform enables "Cost
Knowledge Before it Matters."






Web Site = http://www.apriori.com

Contact Details = Contact:
John Busa
aPriori
978-371-2006
jbusa@apriori.com

  • Printer Friendly Format
  • Back to previous page...
  • Back to home page...
  • Submit your press releases...
  •